Ignorance is Good or Why you can't be Right
I feel that it's important for one to make a distinction between ignorance and misconception. True ignorance is really a trait of humility, and I feel upset that our modern culture has given the word ignorance such a negative connentation.
Since it seems true that the conceivable world might be aparently infinate from a human sensory perspective, it should seem sensible that if one's cogntive capacity is limited, then the attempted comprehension of any infinate set of data should be a logarythmically minimal percentage of totality. So essentially any form of limited sentience, regardless of the size of limitation will be 99.9999...¥% ignorant. So anyone who's not either God, and / or an arrogant jerk, should be able to admit that they are (in all relativity) completely ignorant.
Misconconceived is probably a much better word to use when you're trying to slander someone who one might feel has a false understanding of something they feel strongly about. However, the problem with with only having a .¥...00001% level of enlightenment is that any beleif, knowledge, opinion that anyone might have is most likely always going to be mostly false, and no matter how useful or functional said data might be, it will always be some degree more false than the real existential reality that one might feel they understand.
So pretty much my point is this;

humility = agknowledgment of falasy = ignorance = good = 1

arrogance = conviction of truth = misconception = bad = 0

¿tu comprendes?